linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: hv: Add Hyper-V balloon driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121009124449.f54bf8cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 9 Oct 2012 12:44:49 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, olaf@...fle.de, apw@...onical.com,
	andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: hv: Add Hyper-V balloon driver

On Sun,  7 Oct 2012 16:59:46 -0700
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com> wrote:

> Add the basic balloon driver.

hm, how many balloon drivers does one kernel need?

Although I see that the great majority of this code is hypervisor-specific.

> Windows hosts dynamically manage the guest
> memory allocation via a combination memory hot add and ballooning. Memory
> hot add is used to grow the guest memory upto the maximum memory that can be
> allocatted to the guest. Ballooning is used to both shrink as well as expand
> up to the max memory. Supporting hot add needs additional support from the
> host. We will support hot add when this support is available. For now,
> by setting the VM startup memory to the VM  max memory, we can use
> ballooning alone to dynamically manage memory allocation amongst
> competing guests on a given host.
> 
>
> ...
>
> +static int  alloc_balloon_pages(struct hv_dynmem_device *dm, int num_pages,
> +			 struct dm_balloon_response *bl_resp, int alloc_unit,
> +			 bool *alloc_error)
> +{
> +	int i = 0;
> +	struct page *pg;
> +
> +	if (num_pages < alloc_unit)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; (i * alloc_unit) < num_pages; i++) {
> +		if (bl_resp->hdr.size + sizeof(union dm_mem_page_range) >
> +			PAGE_SIZE)
> +			return i * alloc_unit;
> +
> +		pg = alloc_pages(GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_NORETRY | GFP_ATOMIC |
> +				__GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN,
> +				get_order(alloc_unit << PAGE_SHIFT));

This choice of GFP flags is basically impossible to understand, so I
suggest that a comment be added explaining it all.

I'm a bit surprised at the inclusion of GFP_ATOMIC as it will a) dip
into page reserves, whcih might be undesirable and b) won't even
reclaim clean pages, which seems desirable.  I suggest this also be
covered in the forthcoming code comment.

drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c seems to me to have used better choices here.

> +		if (!pg) {
> +			*alloc_error = true;
> +			return i * alloc_unit;
> +		}
> +
> +		totalram_pages -= alloc_unit;

Well, I'd consider totalram_pages to be an mm-private thing which drivers
shouldn't muck with.  Why is this done?

drivers/xen/balloon.c and drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c also alter
totalram_pages, also without explaining why. 
drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c does not.

> +		dm->num_pages_ballooned += alloc_unit;
> +
> +		bl_resp->range_count++;
> +		bl_resp->range_array[i].finfo.start_page =
> +			page_to_pfn(pg);
> +		bl_resp->range_array[i].finfo.page_cnt = alloc_unit;
> +		bl_resp->hdr.size += sizeof(union dm_mem_page_range);
> +
> +	}
> +
> +	return num_pages;
> +}
>
> ...
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/