[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87txu3bdnj.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:20:48 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Myklebust\, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>,
"linux-nfs\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel\@openvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] SUNRPC: set desired file system root before connecting local transports
"Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 15:35 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> Cc'ing Eric since I seem to recall he suggested doing it this way?
Yes. On second look setting fs->root won't work. We need to change fs.
The problem is that by default all kernel threads share fs so changing
fs->root will have non-local consequences.
I very much believe we want if at all possible to perform a local
modification.
Changing fs isn't all that different from what devtmpfs is doing.
>> Seems OK to me, but maybe that swap_root should be in common code? (Or
>> maybe we could use set_fs_root()?)
>>
>> I'm assuming it's up to Trond to take this.--b.
>
> I'm reluctant to do that at this time since the original proposal was
> precisely that of export set_fs_root() and using it around the AF_LOCAL
> socket bind. That proposal was NACKed by Al Viro.
> If Al is OK with the idea of us creating a private version of
> set_fs_root, then I'd like to see an official Acked-by: that we can
> append to this commit.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists