[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121009203628.GB3616@jtriplet-mobl1>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 13:36:28 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
Ed Cashin <ecashin@...aid.com>,
Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/compiler.h: Add __must_hold macro for functions
called with a lock held
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:06:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 19:06:10 -0700
> Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org> wrote:
>
> > linux/compiler.h has macros to denote functions that acquire or release
> > locks, but not to denote functions called with a lock held that return
> > with the lock still held. Add a __must_hold macro to cover that case.
>
> hum. How does this work? Any code examples and sample sparse output?
> Does it apply to all lock types, etc?
It applies to all the same lock types that __acquires and __releases
apply to: currently everything since Sparse doesn't actually do anything
with the parameter, just the context value.
Various code examples already exist in the kernel tree for __acquires
and __releases, and the mailing list contains many reports of the Sparse
context warnings.
Just as __acquires and __release annotate functions that return with a
lock acquired and get called with a lock that they drop (respectively),
__must_hold annotates a function called with a lock acquired that return
with that lock still acquired.
> IOW, where is all this stuff documented?
The Sparse manpage documents the context bits reasonably well. Other
than that, nowhere that I know of other than the Sparse testsuite and
the source trees of projects like Linux that use Sparse.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists