[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5073AB7A.3020103@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 10:13:38 +0530
From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.com>
To: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@...rix.com>
Cc: "smfrench@...il.com" <smfrench@...il.com>,
"sfrench@...ba.org" <sfrench@...ba.org>,
"jlayton@...hat.com" <jlayton@...hat.com>,
"linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
"samba-technical@...ts.samba.org" <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Convert properly UTF-8 to UTF-16
On 10/08/2012 01:48 PM, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 14:49 -0500, Steve French wrote:
>> Merged - but doesn't the reverse also have to be added in cifs_from_utf16? ie
>>
>> utf16s_to_utf8s(uni, ... );
>>
>
> Not strictly necessary, at least to be able to mount shares.
>
>> I am glad that someone added these multiword handling routines into
>> the kernel for FAT - this has been something we have wanted for a long
>> time in cifs (and smb2/smb3). Note the comment in
>> fs/cifs/cifs_unicode.c
>>
>> / * Note that some windows versions actually send multiword UTF-16 characters
>> * instead of straight UTF16-2. The linux nls routines however aren't able to
>> * deal with those characters properly. In the event that we get some of
>> * those characters, they won't be translated properly.
>> */
>> int
>> cifs_from_utf16(char *to, const __le16 *from, int tolen, int fromlen,
>> const struct nls_table *codepage, bool mapchar)
>>
>
> Should not be UCS-2 instead of UTF16-2 ??
>
>>
>> We could really use some nls test cases for cifs/smb2/smb3/nfs4 which
>> basically did various file, directory, symlink create/rename/delete
>> operations with various hard to map characters so we can test copying
>> to and from the server and ensure that we get the name mappings right
>> for these (and don't ever regress). Fortunately smb2/smb3 is only
>> unicode so we don't have to deal with mappings to other codepages from
>> utf8
>>
>
> Do you have some framework/hook to put these tests ?
>
I recently wrote cifstests to primarily provide a basic infrastructure
for adding regression tests for cifs. It's written in python and the
plan to be able to use python or C bindings for python. You might
consider adding tests to it.
https://github.com/sureshjayaram/cifstests
Thanks
Suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists