| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:17:23 -0700 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sqlite-users@...ite.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, drh@...ci.com Subject: light weight write barriers Richard Hipp writes: > > We would really, really love to have some kind of write-barrier that is > lighter than fsync(). If there is some method other than fsync() for > forcing a write-barrier on Linux that we don't know about, please enlighten > us. Could you list the requirements of such a light weight barrier? i.e. what would it need to do minimally, what's different from fsync/fdatasync ? -Andi -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists