lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:55:27 +0200
From:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC:	socketcan@...tkopp.net, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for can

On 10/10/2012 08:00 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> 
>> On 10/09/2012 03:30 PM, David Howells wrote:
>>> Can you merge the following branch into the can tree please.
>>>
>>> This is to complete part of the Userspace API (UAPI) disintegration for which
>>> the preparatory patches were pulled recently.  After these patches, userspace
>>> headers will be segregated into:
>>>
>>> 	include/uapi/linux/.../foo.h
>>>
>>> for the userspace interface stuff, and:
>>>
>>> 	include/linux/.../foo.h
>>>
>>> for the strictly kernel internal stuff.
>>
>> Nice work David. The upstream for can-next is David Miller's net-next
>> tree. He doesn't like if I pull unrelated stuff into my tree, so I'm
>> going to cherry pick your patch. This is not yet possible, as net-next
>> doesn't include the latest patches from the 3.7 merge window, so that
>> compilation breaks. After the merge window closes David Miller merges
>> back the latest changes to net-next. I'll postpone your patch until
>> then, this means the code will go into v3.8. I'm not familiar with the
>> UAPI conversion, should your patch go via linux-can and David's net into
>> v3.7?
> 
> It's okay for the patch to go into 3.8 if that is easier for you.  As it's
> scripted, I can regenerate your branch after -rc1 if that helps too.

I don't mind, as long as it compiles (using you tag), and it does, the
patch doesn't break anything. From the linux-can and David Miller's net
point of view, v3.7 is closed for new features just bug fixes are
allowed. But I'm open to make an exception, if UAPI hits mainline in
v3.7 on most subsystems. Hopefully David sees it the same way.

Marc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (260 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ