[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121011005846.031707189@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:00:55 +0900
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [ 103/120] mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy()
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
commit 63f74ca21f1fad36d075e063f06dcc6d39fe86b2 upstream.
When shared_policy_replace() fails to allocate new->policy is not freed
correctly by mpol_set_shared_policy(). The problem is that shared
mempolicy code directly call kmem_cache_free() in multiple places where
it is easy to make a mistake.
This patch creates an sp_free wrapper function and uses it. The bug was
introduced pre-git age (IOW, before 2.6.12-rc2).
[mgorman@...e.de: Editted changelog]
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2131,12 +2131,17 @@ mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_
return pol;
}
+static void sp_free(struct sp_node *n)
+{
+ mpol_put(n->policy);
+ kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n);
+}
+
static void sp_delete(struct shared_policy *sp, struct sp_node *n)
{
pr_debug("deleting %lx-l%lx\n", n->start, n->end);
rb_erase(&n->nd, &sp->root);
- mpol_put(n->policy);
- kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n);
+ sp_free(n);
}
static struct sp_node *sp_alloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
@@ -2275,7 +2280,7 @@ int mpol_set_shared_policy(struct shared
}
err = shared_policy_replace(info, vma->vm_pgoff, vma->vm_pgoff+sz, new);
if (err && new)
- kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, new);
+ sp_free(new);
return err;
}
@@ -2292,9 +2297,7 @@ void mpol_free_shared_policy(struct shar
while (next) {
n = rb_entry(next, struct sp_node, nd);
next = rb_next(&n->nd);
- rb_erase(&n->nd, &p->root);
- mpol_put(n->policy);
- kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n);
+ sp_delete(p, n);
}
mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists