[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121011005837.055058933@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:00:13 +0900
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: [ 061/120] SCSI: zfcp: restore refcount check on port_remove
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit d99b601b63386f3395dc26a699ae703a273d9982 upstream.
Upstream commit f3450c7b917201bb49d67032e9f60d5125675d6a
"[SCSI] zfcp: Replace local reference counting with common kref"
accidentally dropped a reference count check before tearing down
zfcp_ports that are potentially in use by zfcp_units.
Even remote ports in use can be removed causing
unreachable garbage objects zfcp_ports with zfcp_units.
Thus units won't come back even after a manual port_rescan.
The kref of zfcp_port->dev.kobj is already used by the driver core.
We cannot re-use it to track the number of zfcp_units.
Re-introduce our own counter for units per port
and check on port_remove.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c | 1 +
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h | 1 +
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h | 1 +
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c
@@ -519,6 +519,7 @@ struct zfcp_port *zfcp_port_enqueue(stru
rwlock_init(&port->unit_list_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&port->unit_list);
+ atomic_set(&port->units, 0);
INIT_WORK(&port->gid_pn_work, zfcp_fc_port_did_lookup);
INIT_WORK(&port->test_link_work, zfcp_fc_link_test_work);
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h
@@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ struct zfcp_port {
struct zfcp_adapter *adapter; /* adapter used to access port */
struct list_head unit_list; /* head of logical unit list */
rwlock_t unit_list_lock; /* unit list lock */
+ atomic_t units; /* zfcp_unit count */
atomic_t status; /* status of this remote port */
u64 wwnn; /* WWNN if known */
u64 wwpn; /* WWPN */
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ extern void zfcp_scsi_dif_sense_error(st
extern struct attribute_group zfcp_sysfs_unit_attrs;
extern struct attribute_group zfcp_sysfs_adapter_attrs;
extern struct attribute_group zfcp_sysfs_port_attrs;
+extern struct mutex zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex;
extern struct device_attribute *zfcp_sysfs_sdev_attrs[];
extern struct device_attribute *zfcp_sysfs_shost_attrs[];
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c
@@ -227,6 +227,8 @@ static ssize_t zfcp_sysfs_port_rescan_st
static ZFCP_DEV_ATTR(adapter, port_rescan, S_IWUSR, NULL,
zfcp_sysfs_port_rescan_store);
+DEFINE_MUTEX(zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex);
+
static ssize_t zfcp_sysfs_port_remove_store(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t count)
@@ -249,6 +251,16 @@ static ssize_t zfcp_sysfs_port_remove_st
else
retval = 0;
+ mutex_lock(&zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex);
+ if (atomic_read(&port->units) > 0) {
+ retval = -EBUSY;
+ mutex_unlock(&zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ /* port is about to be removed, so no more unit_add */
+ atomic_set(&port->units, -1);
+ mutex_unlock(&zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex);
+
write_lock_irq(&adapter->port_list_lock);
list_del(&port->list);
write_unlock_irq(&adapter->port_list_lock);
@@ -289,12 +301,14 @@ static ssize_t zfcp_sysfs_unit_add_store
{
struct zfcp_port *port = container_of(dev, struct zfcp_port, dev);
u64 fcp_lun;
+ int retval;
if (strict_strtoull(buf, 0, (unsigned long long *) &fcp_lun))
return -EINVAL;
- if (zfcp_unit_add(port, fcp_lun))
- return -EINVAL;
+ retval = zfcp_unit_add(port, fcp_lun);
+ if (retval)
+ return retval;
return count;
}
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static void zfcp_unit_release(struct dev
{
struct zfcp_unit *unit = container_of(dev, struct zfcp_unit, dev);
- put_device(&unit->port->dev);
+ atomic_dec(&unit->port->units);
kfree(unit);
}
@@ -119,16 +119,27 @@ static void zfcp_unit_release(struct dev
int zfcp_unit_add(struct zfcp_port *port, u64 fcp_lun)
{
struct zfcp_unit *unit;
+ int retval = 0;
+
+ mutex_lock(&zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex);
+ if (atomic_read(&port->units) == -1) {
+ /* port is already gone */
+ retval = -ENODEV;
+ goto out;
+ }
unit = zfcp_unit_find(port, fcp_lun);
if (unit) {
put_device(&unit->dev);
- return -EEXIST;
+ retval = -EEXIST;
+ goto out;
}
unit = kzalloc(sizeof(struct zfcp_unit), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!unit)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!unit) {
+ retval = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
unit->port = port;
unit->fcp_lun = fcp_lun;
@@ -139,28 +150,33 @@ int zfcp_unit_add(struct zfcp_port *port
if (dev_set_name(&unit->dev, "0x%016llx",
(unsigned long long) fcp_lun)) {
kfree(unit);
- return -ENOMEM;
+ retval = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
}
- get_device(&port->dev);
-
if (device_register(&unit->dev)) {
put_device(&unit->dev);
- return -ENOMEM;
+ retval = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
}
if (sysfs_create_group(&unit->dev.kobj, &zfcp_sysfs_unit_attrs)) {
device_unregister(&unit->dev);
- return -EINVAL;
+ retval = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
}
+ atomic_inc(&port->units); /* under zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex ! */
+
write_lock_irq(&port->unit_list_lock);
list_add_tail(&unit->list, &port->unit_list);
write_unlock_irq(&port->unit_list_lock);
zfcp_unit_scsi_scan(unit);
- return 0;
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex);
+ return retval;
}
/**
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists