linux-kernel - [ 072/120] ext4: fix fdatasync() for files with only i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121011005839.414809986@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:00:24 +0900
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Kristian Nielsen <knielsen@...elsen-hq.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [ 072/120] ext4: fix fdatasync() for files with only i_size changes

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit b71fc079b5d8f42b2a52743c8d2f1d35d655b1c5 upstream.

Code tracking when transaction needs to be committed on fdatasync(2) forgets
to handle a situation when only inode's i_size is changed. Thus in such
situations fdatasync(2) doesn't force transaction with new i_size to disk
and that can result in wrong i_size after a crash.

Fix the issue by updating inode's i_datasync_tid whenever its size is
updated.

Reported-by: Kristian Nielsen <knielsen@...elsen-hq.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ext4/inode.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -3892,6 +3892,7 @@ static int ext4_do_update_inode(handle_t
 	struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
 	struct buffer_head *bh = iloc->bh;
 	int err = 0, rc, block;
+	int need_datasync = 0;
 
 	/* For fields not not tracking in the in-memory inode,
 	 * initialise them to zero for new inodes. */
@@ -3940,7 +3941,10 @@ static int ext4_do_update_inode(handle_t
 		raw_inode->i_file_acl_high =
 			cpu_to_le16(ei->i_file_acl >> 32);
 	raw_inode->i_file_acl_lo = cpu_to_le32(ei->i_file_acl);
-	ext4_isize_set(raw_inode, ei->i_disksize);
+	if (ei->i_disksize != ext4_isize(raw_inode)) {
+		ext4_isize_set(raw_inode, ei->i_disksize);
+		need_datasync = 1;
+	}
 	if (ei->i_disksize > 0x7fffffffULL) {
 		struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
 		if (!EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
@@ -3991,7 +3995,7 @@ static int ext4_do_update_inode(handle_t
 		err = rc;
 	ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_NEW);
 
-	ext4_update_inode_fsync_trans(handle, inode, 0);
+	ext4_update_inode_fsync_trans(handle, inode, need_datasync);
 out_brelse:
 	brelse(bh);
 	ext4_std_error(inode->i_sb, err);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/