linux-kernel - [ 52/84] mm: thp: fix pmd_present for split_huge_page and PROT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121011015426.430086423@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:03:36 +0900
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [ 52/84] mm: thp: fix pmd_present for split_huge_page and PROT_NONE with THP

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>

commit 027ef6c87853b0a9df53175063028edb4950d476 upstream.

In many places !pmd_present has been converted to pmd_none.  For pmds
that's equivalent and pmd_none is quicker so using pmd_none is better.

However (unless we delete pmd_present) we should provide an accurate
pmd_present too.  This will avoid the risk of code thinking the pmd is non
present because it's under __split_huge_page_map, see the pmd_mknotpresent
there and the comment above it.

If the page has been mprotected as PROT_NONE, it would also lead to a
pmd_present false negative in the same way as the race with
split_huge_page.

Because the PSE bit stays on at all times (both during split_huge_page and
when the _PAGE_PROTNONE bit get set), we could only check for the PSE bit,
but checking the PROTNONE bit too is still good to remember pmd_present
must always keep PROT_NONE into account.

This explains a not reproducible BUG_ON that was seldom reported on the
lists.

The same issue is in pmd_large, it would go wrong with both PROT_NONE and
if it races with split_huge_page.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h |   11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -146,8 +146,7 @@ static inline unsigned long pmd_pfn(pmd_

 static inline int pmd_large(pmd_t pte)
 {
-	return (pmd_flags(pte) & (_PAGE_PSE | _PAGE_PRESENT)) ==
-		(_PAGE_PSE | _PAGE_PRESENT);
+	return pmd_flags(pte) & _PAGE_PSE;
 }

 #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
@@ -415,7 +414,13 @@ static inline int pte_hidden(pte_t pte)

 static inline int pmd_present(pmd_t pmd)
 {
-	return pmd_flags(pmd) & _PAGE_PRESENT;
+	/*
+	 * Checking for _PAGE_PSE is needed too because
+	 * split_huge_page will temporarily clear the present bit (but
+	 * the _PAGE_PSE flag will remain set at all times while the
+	 * _PAGE_PRESENT bit is clear).
+	 */
+	return pmd_flags(pmd) & (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_PROTNONE | _PAGE_PSE);
 }

 static inline int pmd_none(pmd_t pmd)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/