[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877gqxfg2g.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:09:35 +0530
From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Srikar <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiannan Ouyang <ouyang@...pitt.edu>,
chegu vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] kvm: Handle undercommitted guest case in PLE handler
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:24:55 -0500, Andrew Theurer <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Below is again 8 x 20-way VMs, but this time I tried out Nikunj's gang
> scheduling patches. While I am not recommending gang scheduling, I
> think it's a good data point. The performance is 3.88x the PLE result.
>
> https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6tfUNlZ-14wWXdscWcwNTVEY3M
That looks pretty good and serves the purpose. And the result says it all.
> Note that the task switching intervals of 4ms are quite obvious again,
> and this time all vCPUs from same VM run at the same time. It
> represents the best possible outcome.
>
>
> Anyway, I thought the bitmaps might help better visualize what's going
> on.
>
> -Andrew
>
Regards
Nikunj
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists