[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1349973438.6903.4@snotra>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:37:18 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Timur Tabi <B04825@...escale.com>
CC: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-ppc tree with the
powerpc-merge tree
On 10/11/2012 10:55:42 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> > This is about kvm_host.h, which is the part that is exported to user
> > space. It usually contains constants and structs that are required
> for
> > the API.
>
> Which API? I'm not familiar with KVM internals.
>
> My concern is that when I think of a user-space header file, I think
> of a
> user-space application that calls ioctls. I know that KVM guest
> kernels
> run as user-space processes, but that does not seem like a reason to
> combine all of the header files that the KVM guest kernel needs with
> "real" user-space header files.
So where should guest headers go?
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists