[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92645B27BF79D04FBD2B0F8494FFD0F9102B85@G2W2429.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:46:29 +0000
From: "Zhang, Lin-Bao (Linux Kernel R&D)" <linbao.zhang@...com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Croxon, Nigel" <nigel.croxon@...com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Sakkinen, Jarkko" <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>,
"joerg.roedel@....com" <joerg.roedel@....com>,
"agordeev@...hat.com" <agordeev@...hat.com>,
"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"Zhang, Lin-Bao (Linux Kernel R&D)" <linbao.zhang@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] fix x2apic defect that Linux kernel doesn't mask 8259A
interrupt during the time window between changing VT-d table base address
and initializing these VT-d entries(smpboot.c and apic.c )
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suresh Siddha [mailto:suresh.b.siddha@...el.com]
> Sent: 2012年10月10日 18:02
> > > So I looked at why you are seeing the problem with v2.6.32 but not
> > > with the recent kernels. And I think I found out the reason.
> >
> > I want to know what masking IO-APIC means?
>
> As the platform is configured to use virtual-wire B and the corresponding
> IO-APIC RTE is masked, that interrupt will be dropped.
>
thanks for your explanation and confirm, I also consulted BIOS guys ,
yes, interrupt will be dropped , software didn't see them,and don't go to handle them.
So we OS don't need to disable 8259A interrupt during the window
, only if 2.6.32 has applied your patch(triggered some actions to mask IO-apic)
That's good. Perfect design . thanks.
Here we go!
---------------
-- Bob(LinBao Zhang)
HP linux kernel enginner
Powered by blists - more mailing lists