[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121011180612.GY12801@game.jcrosoft.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:06:12 +0200
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Add UART support to the u9540 Device
Tree
On 10:22 Thu 11 Oct , Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>
> > On 08:29 Thu 11 Oct , Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 16:18 Wed 10 Oct , Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > Add the 3 UART nodes required to enable serial ports on the u9540.
> > > > >
> > > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > > > dts? it's dtsi
> > >
> > > No it's not.
> > so the name of the file is wrong s u9540 is a SoC name
>
> The board could actually be called either ccu9540, or just
> u9540. I picked one and went with it. The full name is the
> u9540 development board.
so use ccu9540 as u9540 is the soc name so if we use u9540 as compatible we
expect to mach the soc and not a board
Best Regards,
J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists