[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121012091535.GD21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:15:35 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: arm@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] clk: don't mark clkdev_add_table as init
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:13:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> s3c2440_clk_add is a subsys_interface method and calls clkdev_add_table,
> which means we might be calling it after the __init section is
> discarded.
>
> Without this patch, building mini2440_defconfig results in:
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x9848): Section mismatch in reference from the function s3c2440_clk_add() to the function .init.text:clkdev_add_table()
> The function s3c2440_clk_add() references
> the function __init clkdev_add_table().
> This is often because s3c2440_clk_add lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of clkdev_add_table is wrong.
I'm not sure this is the right thing to do. I suspect this comes from the
stupidly complex samsung code, and that this is actually safe - I suspect
that s3c2440_clk_add() needs to be appropriately marked, but then you end
up having to trace its call path through various structures etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists