[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpokcW=zGP-OYQm-ZLhHJFRdnZZGyWZEbVWnj2rjqfb+j2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:00:23 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
vinod.koul@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
spear-devel@...t.st.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support
On 12 October 2012 14:55, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> I understand your way of allocating memory, but what about using
> linked list instead of array?
I gave it a thought. Overhead was 4 bytes more per slave structure +
more cycles in filter routine (arrays are more faster :) ).
Because the DT capture is a one time activity, its better to save time
in filter fns.
> And one more thing. May be we could introduce backlink to the platform
> data in the dw_dma structure instead of copying certain parameters?
Will do that in a separate patch, outside the scope of this patchset. :)
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists