[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121012115628.GA14991@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:56:28 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] Convert mce_disabled
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 04:20:40PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Hi Boris, Thanks for getting to this before I could!
Ah ok, I thought you wasn't interested in doing this anymore :).
> I had a look but I still feel boolean is a better way to go. With
> bool, we can get rid of the #defines above and more importantly, the
> aux field in dev_ext_attribute since that is used in other places
> too. Further, I suspect we'll still end up using the same or less
> memory since we don't have that many boolean members within the MCA
> code.
My main intention was to have all those in a single struct and use a
single store_bit/show_bit function.
Sure, you can do bools but this'll still be single variables spread
around in mce.c instead of one single struct mca_config which nicely
encapsulates all the configuration we do in the MCA code.
Or, you can modify the mca_config I have there and use bools and pass a
pointer to each actual bool member in each DEVICE_BIT_ATTR invocation
(and rename it to DEVICE_BOOL_ATTR). Yeah, that could work, unless I'm
missing something else, of course.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists