[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpokNE4Pao+tbAFvMC_Yyo-oNvwjbGjV2XKdard4=616e6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 20:17:49 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"spear-devel@...t.st.com" <spear-devel@...t.st.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support
On 12 October 2012 20:11, Shevchenko, Andriy
<andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 19:36 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> I meant is to use that constant instead of hard coding 4 everywhere.
> It's a maximum value, not the SoC specific.
Can be done.
>> + u32 val, arr[4];
> what about to use tmp name instead of val? It's really minor, but I
> think val name is little bit unrelated to a loop counter.
Its not minor at all, its major. Even when i was coding it, i thought
about renaming
it several times during this last patch. But couldn't find a better name.
I don't like tmp. Give me something better.
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists