linux-kernel - irq/manage.c wrong comment( ? )

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1350055963.8329.27.camel@anish-Inspiron-N5050>
Date:	Sat, 13 Oct 2012 00:32:43 +0900
From:	anish kumar <anish198519851985@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: irq/manage.c wrong comment( ? )

Hello tglx,

I just found the below inconsistency while going through the code.


kernel/irq/manage.c

    if (new->flags & IRQF_ONESHOT) {
        /*
         * The thread_mask for the action is or'ed to
         * desc->thread_active to indicate that the
         * IRQF_ONESHOT thread handler has been woken, but not
         * yet finished. The bit is cleared when a thread
         * completes. When all threads of a shared interr

Shouldn't this "desc->thread_active" be desc->threads_active ??

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/