[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50787432.8030805@lwfinger.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:49:06 -0500
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Spurious warning in checkpatch.pl?
On 10/12/2012 01:38 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 13:23 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>> Andy,
>>
>> The checkpatch.pl version in mainline is issuing what I think are false warnings
>> of the type
>>
>> WARNING: networking block comments put the trailing */ on a separate line
>> #93: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/wifi.h:208:
>> + u32 rf_rb; /* rflssi_readback */
>>
>> Is a trailing comment for the member of a struct not allowed?
>
> It's allowed. Maybe even better, encouraged.
>
> It's a change I made in commit 058806007450
> ("checkpatch: check networking specific block comment style")
> without sufficient testing.
>
> I'll see about fixing it.
Joe,
Good. I will ignore those warnings.
One more question. Was the warning below intended?
WARNING: networking block comments put the trailing */ on a separate line
#1846: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8723ae/hal_btc.h:27:
+ *****************************************************************************/
To me, that line at the end of a copyright block looks better then
****************************************************************************
*/
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists