linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Add UART support to the u9540 Device Tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdb9xCzpsidy9Ro+yauzwV7r+xPYOb8NAG8mfn=h8fuKVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:15:21 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Add UART support to the u9540 Device Tree

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
<plagnioj@...osoft.com> wrote:
> On 10:22 Thu 11 Oct     , Lee Jones wrote:

>> The board could actually be called either ccu9540, or just
>> u9540. I picked one and went with it. The full name is the
>> u9540 development board.
>
> so use ccu9540 as u9540 is the soc name so if we use u9540 as compatible we
> expect to mach the soc and not a board

I basically agree.

However the SoC (digital ASIC) is named DB9540.

U9540 is the entire chipset (DB9540, AB9540 etc) a variant
of the NovaThor series.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/