linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the vfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121012150215.e0cdeb26e2f7ec898129432f@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:02:15 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the vfs tree

Hi Al,

Today's linux-next merge of the signal tree got a conflict in
arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c between commit 2a5e5beb88c5 ("vfs: define
struct filename and have getname() return it") from the vfs tree and
commit 8f1597e959a3 ("mn10300: switch to generic sys_execve()") from the
signal tree.

The latter removed the function modified by the former, so I did that and
can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped