[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121012044901.GA17913@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:49:01 +0900
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efivarfs: Implement exclusive access for
{get,set}_variable
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:42:36PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 21:19 +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> > Currently, efivarfs does not enforce exclusion over the get_variable and
> > set_variable operations. Section 7.1 of UEFI requires us to only allow a
> > single processor to enter {get,set}_variable services at once.
> >
> > This change acquires the efivars->lock over calls to these operations
> > from the efivarfs paths.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/firmware/efivars.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks, applied to 'next'.
Should this be backported to the stable kernels?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists