[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <507BCD79.4040304@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:46:49 +0200
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:3205 (stable 3.5.3)
Am 14.10.2012 14:27, schrieb Alan Cox:
>> The people which are responsible that the chips for "consumer"-HW and
>> laptops got their (already included) ECC functionality disabled should
>> get hit with Googles (now 3y old) study on that topic all the day.
>> Leaving customers in danger by not offering them at least the
>> possibility to use ECC RAM is just stupid.
>
> For the amount of RAM in devices now days then yes probably a good idea.
> Adding to the problem is that there is an active market in fake brandname
> DIMMs.
My solution is now that I will add memtest=1 to all my own Linux systems
which don't have ECC (unfortunatley currently almost all). That doesn't
cost that much time at startup and will give me at least a small chance
to spot those extremely hard to find problems.
Regards,
Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists