linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: Load Balancing using Per-entity-Load-tracking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <507BD3FC.1020703@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:44:36 +0530
From:	preeti <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	peterz@...radead.org, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pjt@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: Load Balancing using Per-entity-Load-tracking

Hi everyone,

The past few weeks must have been very tight due to the merge
window phase.Looks like it got through well :)

I request you to comment on this patchset.Primarily because it forces us
to look into the below scenario:

Highly loaded sched groups does not mean too many tasks and less loaded
sched groups does not mean too few tasks.

Thank you

Regards
Preeti

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/