[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121015154724.GA2840@barrios>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:47:24 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
Jiri Kosina <jiri.kosina@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: teach mm by current context info to not do
I/O during memory allocation
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 01:14:17PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> This patch introduces PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO on process flag('flags' field of
> 'struct task_struct'), so that the flag can be set by one task
> to avoid doing I/O inside memory allocation in the task's context.
>
> The patch trys to solve one deadlock problem caused by block device,
> and the problem can be occured at least in the below situations:
>
> - during block device runtime resume situation, if memory allocation
> with GFP_KERNEL is called inside runtime resume callback of any one
> of its ancestors(or the block device itself), the deadlock may be
> triggered inside the memory allocation since it might not complete
> until the block device becomes active and the involed page I/O finishes.
> The situation is pointed out first by Alan Stern. It is not a good
> approach to convert all GFP_KERNEL in the path into GFP_NOIO because
> several subsystems may be involved(for example, PCI, USB and SCSI may
> be involved for usb mass stoarage device)
Couldn't we expand pm_restrict_gfp_mask to cover resume path as well as
suspend path?
>
> - during error handling situation of usb mass storage deivce, USB
> bus reset will be put on the device, so there shouldn't have any
> memory allocation with GFP_KERNEL during USB bus reset, otherwise
> the deadlock similar with above may be triggered. Unfortunately, any
> usb device may include one mass storage interface in theory, so it
> requires all usb interface drivers to handle the situation. In fact,
> most usb drivers don't know how to handle bus reset on the device
> and don't provide .pre_set() and .post_reset() callback at all, so
> USB core has to unbind and bind driver for these devices. So it
> is still not practical to resort to GFP_NOIO for solving the problem.
I hope this case could be handled by usb core like usb_restrict_gfp_mask
rather than adding new branch on fast path.
>
> Also the introduced solution can be used by block subsystem or block
> drivers too, for example, set the PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO flag before doing
> actual I/O transfer.
>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jiri.kosina@...e.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
> Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 5 +++++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index f6961c9..33be290 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1811,6 +1811,7 @@ extern void thread_group_times(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut, cputime_t *
> #define PF_FROZEN 0x00010000 /* frozen for system suspend */
> #define PF_FSTRANS 0x00020000 /* inside a filesystem transaction */
> #define PF_KSWAPD 0x00040000 /* I am kswapd */
> +#define PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO 0x00080000 /* Allocating memory without IO involved */
> #define PF_LESS_THROTTLE 0x00100000 /* Throttle me less: I clean memory */
> #define PF_KTHREAD 0x00200000 /* I am a kernel thread */
> #define PF_RANDOMIZE 0x00400000 /* randomize virtual address space */
> @@ -1848,6 +1849,10 @@ extern void thread_group_times(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut, cputime_t *
> #define tsk_used_math(p) ((p)->flags & PF_USED_MATH)
> #define used_math() tsk_used_math(current)
>
> +#define tsk_memalloc_no_io(p) ((p)->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO)
> +#define tsk_memalloc_allow_io(p) do { (p)->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO; } while (0)
> +#define tsk_memalloc_forbid_io(p) do { (p)->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO; } while (0)
> +
> /*
> * task->jobctl flags
> */
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 8e1be1c..e15381f 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2596,6 +2596,8 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> int alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_LOW|ALLOC_CPUSET;
>
> gfp_mask &= gfp_allowed_mask;
> + if (unlikely(tsk_memalloc_no_io(current)))
> + gfp_mask &= ~GFP_IOFS;
>
> lockdep_trace_alloc(gfp_mask);
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
Kind Regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists