lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:14:18 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3] PM / Runtime: force memory allocation with no I/O during runtime_resume callbcack

This patch applies the introduces tsk_memalloc_forbid_io() and
tsk_memalloc_allow_io() to force memory allocation with no I/O
during runtime_resume callback.

Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/base/power/runtime.c |   13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
index 3148b10..76836c1 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -652,7 +652,20 @@ static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
 	if (!callback && dev->driver && dev->driver->pm)
 		callback = dev->driver->pm->runtime_resume;
 
+	/*
+	 * Deadlock might be caused if memory allocation with GFP_KERNEL
+	 * happens inside runtime_resume callback of one block device's
+	 * ancestor or the block device itself. The easiest approach is
+	 * to forbid I/O inside runtime_resume of all devices.
+	 *
+	 * In fact, it can be done only if the deivce is a block device
+	 * or there is one block device descendant. But that may become
+	 * complicated and not efficient because device tree traversing
+	 * is involved.
+	 */
+	tsk_memalloc_forbid_io(current);
 	retval = rpm_callback(callback, dev);
+	tsk_memalloc_allow_io(current);
 	if (retval) {
 		__update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_SUSPENDED);
 		pm_runtime_cancel_pending(dev);
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ