[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121015221406.GA19848@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:14:06 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 03:07:28AM +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h between commit f3d447a97f24 ("arm64: Do
> not include asm/unistd32.h in asm/unistd.h") from Linus' tree and commit
> "compat: generic compat_sys_sched_rr_get_interval implementation" from
> the akpm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> (no action is required).
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
> index 63f853f..0f13ca8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
> @@ -25,5 +25,6 @@
> #define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SIGPROCMASK
> #define __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
> #define __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_SENDFILE
> +#define __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_SCHED_RR_GET_INTERVAL
> #endif
> #include <uapi/asm/unistd.h>
The fix is correct (I moved the __ARCH_WANT_* from unistd32.h to
unistd.h) but I'll post another version of the patch tomorrow for Andrew
to merge.
Thanks.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists