lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7itxtvpate.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2012 01:36:29 +0200
From:	Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@....jussieu.fr>
To:	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Write is not atomic?

> You don't check return code here, does write succeed at all?

Yes, both writes return 6.

> Does it ever produce e.g. OuOuilleille

No.

> (as this is what atomicity is about here)?

I was referring to the claim that under Linux writing and adjusting the
file offset are performed as an atomic step, not to the atomicity of the
write operation itself.

-- Juliusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ