| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:45:59 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...il.com>
Cc: 김재극 <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, 'Theodore Ts'o' <tytso@....edu>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chur.lee@...sung.com, cm224.lee@...sung.com,
jooyoung.hwang@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] f2fs: add segment operations
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 00:12:53 +0900 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...il.com> wrote:
> 2012-10-11 (목), 09:37 +1100, NeilBrown:
> > On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:00:55 +0900 김재극 <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +/**
> > > + * Find a new segment from the free segments bitmap to right order
> > > + * This function should be returned with success, otherwise BUG
> > > + */
> > > +static void get_new_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > + unsigned int *newseg, bool new_sec, int dir)
> > > +{
> > > + struct free_segmap_info *free_i = FREE_I(sbi);
> > > + unsigned int total_secs = sbi->total_sections;
> > > + unsigned int segno, secno, zoneno;
> > > + unsigned int total_zones = sbi->total_sections / sbi->secs_per_zone;
> > > + unsigned int hint = *newseg >> sbi->log_segs_per_sec;
> > > + unsigned int old_zoneno = GET_ZONENO_FROM_SEGNO(sbi, *newseg);
> > > + unsigned int left_start = hint;
> > > + bool init = true;
> > > + int go_left = 0;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + write_lock(&free_i->segmap_lock);
> > > +
> > > + if (!new_sec && ((*newseg + 1) % sbi->segs_per_sec)) {
> > > + segno = find_next_zero_bit(free_i->free_segmap,
> > > + TOTAL_SEGS(sbi), *newseg + 1);
> > > + if (segno < TOTAL_SEGS(sbi))
> > > + goto got_it;
> > > + }
> > > +find_other_zone:
> > > + secno = find_next_zero_bit(free_i->free_secmap, total_secs, hint);
> > > + if (secno >= total_secs) {
> > > + if (dir == ALLOC_RIGHT) {
> > > + secno = find_next_zero_bit(free_i->free_secmap,
> > > + total_secs, 0);
> > > + BUG_ON(secno >= total_secs);
> > > + } else {
> > > + go_left = 1;
> > > + left_start = hint - 1;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + if (go_left == 0)
> > > + goto skip_left;
> > > +
> > > + while (test_bit(left_start, free_i->free_secmap)) {
> > > + if (left_start > 0) {
> > > + left_start--;
> > > + continue;
> > > + }
> > > + left_start = find_next_zero_bit(free_i->free_secmap,
> > > + total_secs, 0);
> > > + BUG_ON(left_start >= total_secs);
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + secno = left_start;
> > > +skip_left:
> > > + hint = secno;
> > > + segno = secno << sbi->log_segs_per_sec;
> > > + zoneno = secno / sbi->secs_per_zone;
> > > +
> > > + if (sbi->secs_per_zone == 1)
> > > + goto got_it;
> > > + if (zoneno == old_zoneno)
> > > + goto got_it;
> > > + if (dir == ALLOC_LEFT) {
> > > + if (!go_left && zoneno + 1 >= total_zones)
> > > + goto got_it;
> > > + if (go_left && zoneno == 0)
> > > + goto got_it;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < DEFAULT_CURSEGS; i++) {
> > > + struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, i);
> > > +
> > > + if (curseg->zone != zoneno)
> > > + continue;
> > > + if (!init)
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + if (go_left)
> > > + hint = zoneno * sbi->secs_per_zone - 1;
> > > + else if (zoneno + 1 >= total_zones)
> > > + hint = 0;
> > > + else
> > > + hint = (zoneno + 1) * sbi->secs_per_zone;
> > > + init = false;
> > > + goto find_other_zone;
> > > + }
> >
> > I think this code is correct, but I found it very confusing to read.
> > The point of the loop is simply to find out if any current segment using the
> > given zone. But that isn't obvious, it seem to do more.
> > I would re-write it as:
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < DEFAULT_CURSEGS ; i++) {
> > struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, i);
> > if (curseg->zone == zoneno)
> > break;
> > }
> > if (i < DEFAULT_CURSEGS && init) {
> > /* Zone is in use,try another */
> > if (go_left)
> > hint = ....
> > else if (....)
> > hint = 0;
> > else
> > hint = ......;
> > init = false;
> > goto find_other_zone;
> > }
> >
> > To me, that makes it much clearer what is happening.
> >
>
> Ok.
> I think it had better change like this to avoid unecessary loop.
>
> /* give up on finding another zone */
> if (!init)
> goto got_it;
>
> for (i = 0; i < DEFAULT_CURSEGS; i++) {
> if (CURSEG_I(sbi, i)->zone == zoneno)
> break;
> }
>
> if (i < DEFAULT_CURSEGS) {
> /* zone is in use, try another */
> if (go_left)
> hint = ....
> else if (....)
> hint = 0;
> else
> hint = ......;
> init = false;
> goto find_other_zone;
> }
Yes, that looks good. Thanks.
>
> > > +static void f2fs_end_io_write(struct bio *bio, int err)
> > > +{
> > > + const int uptodate = test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags);
> > > + struct bio_vec *bvec = bio->bi_io_vec + bio->bi_vcnt - 1;
> > > + struct bio_private *p = bio->bi_private;
> > > +
> > > + do {
> > > + struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
> > > +
> > > + if (--bvec >= bio->bi_io_vec)
> > > + prefetchw(&bvec->bv_page->flags);
> > > + if (!uptodate) {
> > > + SetPageError(page);
> > > + if (page->mapping)
> > > + set_bit(AS_EIO, &page->mapping->flags);
> > > + p->sbi->ckpt->ckpt_flags |= CP_ERROR_FLAG;
> > > + set_page_dirty(page);
> > > + }
> > > + end_page_writeback(page);
> > > + dec_page_count(p->sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK);
> > > + } while (bvec >= bio->bi_io_vec);
> > > +
> > > + if (p->is_sync)
> > > + complete(p->wait);
> > > + kfree(p);
> > > + bio_put(bio);
> > > +}
> >
> > This comment doesn't neatly attach to just one piece of code, but it is
> > closely related to f2fs_end_io_write, so I'll put it here.
> >
> > When you are writing a checkpoint you write out a number of blocks without
> > setting ->is_sync, and then write one block with is_sync set.
> > The expectation seems to be that when that last block is written and so calls
> > complete(p->wait);
> > then all the blocks have been written.
> > I don't think that is a valid assumption in general. Various things can
> > re-order blocks. Back when we had BIO_BARRIER, a barrier request would force
> > that semantic, but that was found to be too problematic.
> > You use WRITE_FLUSH_FUA for the ->is_sync write, but that is not necessarily
> > enough to keep everything in order. You really should wait for all the
> > blocks to report that they are complete. Probably have an atomic counter of
> > pending blocks and each one does
> > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&counter))
> > complete(->wait);
> >
>
> Yes, WRITE_FLUSH_FUA does not guarantee the write order.
> So, f2fs does checkpoint with the following procedure.
> 1. inc_page_count(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK) whenever submitting bios.
> (ref. submit_write_page())
> 2. wait until the number of writeback pages is equal to 0.
> (ref. dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK) in end_io)
> 3. the last bio for checkpoint blocks is submitted with
> ->is_sync.
and you have
/* wait for previous submitted node/meta pages writeback */
while (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK))
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ / 50);
in do_checkpoint(). That was the piece I was missing.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> Thank you for valuable comments.
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > NeilBrown
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists