[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <507D1406.50307@parallels.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:00:06 +0400
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] posix timers: allocate timer id per task
15.10.2012 21:04, Peter Zijlstra пишет:
> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 20:17 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> This patch is required CRIU project (www.criu.org).
>> To migrate processes with posix timers we have to make sure, that we can
>> restore posix timer with proper id.
>> Currently, this is not true, because timer ids are allocated globally.
>> So, this is precursor patch and it's purpose is make posix timer id to be
>> allocated per task.
>>
>> Patch replaces global idr with global hash table for posix timers and
>> makes timer ids unique not globally, but per task. Next free timer id is type
>> of integer and stored on signal struct (posix_timer_id). If free timer id
>> reaches negative value on timer creation, it will be dropped to zero and
>> -EAGAIN will be returned to user.
>> Hash table is size of page (4KB).
>> Key is constructed as follows:
>> key = hash_ptr(current->signal) ^ hash_32(posix_timer_id);
>
> but but but.. isn't this what namespaces were invented for to solve? Why
> not use the regular namespace infrastructure?
>
The reason is that CRIU have to support single processes within existent namespaces.
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists