| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdVLh7JN10YEiA1P=iV-T3enpL639_ZKSsj1ubzvNihNg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:14:52 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmatest: terminate all ongoing transfers before submitting new one On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote: >>> Also, the proposed solution might hide some other important errors. We may need >>> to terminate transfers when we found that an error is there in last transfers: >> I think it could be better than first solution, but what do you think >> about marking each transfer with corresponding id? > > But dma_test expects the transfer to finish within timeout. If it > doesn't, then that's > an error. > > So, for testing your s/w emulation, you must pass higher timeout. And > terminating > transfers for error case would be better, to make them timeout safe. Yeah, seems the patch is not necessary. In case of software emulation we just have a test passed much slow... -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists