| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121016172515.GD26075@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:25:15 +0100
From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@...aro.org>
To: Fei Yang <yangfei.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>, linux@....linux.org.uk,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, magnus.damm@...il.com, kgene.kim@...sung.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-assembly@...r.kernel.org" <linux-assembly@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Yangfei (Felix)" <felix.yang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Hardcoded instruction causes certain features to
fail on ARM platfrom due to endianness
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:33:54AM +0800, Fei Yang wrote:
> 2012/10/16 Dave Martin <dave.martin@...aro.org>:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:33:08PM +0800, Fei Yang wrote:
> >> 2012/10/15 Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>:
> >> > Yangfei (Felix) writes:
> >> > > Hi all,
> >> > >
> >> > > I found that hardcoded instruction in inline asm can cause certains certain features fail to work on ARM platform due to endianness.
> >> > > As an example, consider the following code snippet of platform_do_lowpower function from arch/arm/mach-realview/hotplug.c:
> >> > > / *
> >> > > * here's the WFI
> >> > > */
> >> > > asm(".word 0xe320f003\n"
> >> > > :
> >> > > :
> >> > > : "memory", "cc");
> >> > >
> >> > > The instruction generated from this inline asm will not work on big-endian ARM platform, such as ARM BE-8 format. Instead, an exception will be generated.
> >> > >
> >> > > Here the code should be:
> >> > > / *
> >> > > * here's the WFI
> >> > > */
> >> > > asm("WFI\n"
> >> > > :
> >> > > :
> >> > > : "memory", "cc");
> >> > >
> >> > > Seems the kernel doesn't support ARM BE-8 well. I don't know why this problem happens.
> >> > > Can anyone tell me who owns this part? I can prepare a patch then.
> >> > > Thanks.
> >> >
> >> > Questions regarding the ARM kernel should go to the linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> >> > (see the MAINTAINERS file), with an optional cc: to the regular LKML.
> >> >
> >> > BE-8 is, if I recall correctly, ARMv7's broken format where code and data have
> >> > different endianess. GAS supports an ".inst" directive which is like ".word"
> >> > except the data is assumed to be code. This matters for disassembly, and may
> >> > also be required for BE-8.
> >> >
> >> > That is, just s/.word/.inst/g above and report back if that works or not.
> >> > --
> >> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> >> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hi Mikael,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the reply. I modified the code as suggested and rebuilt the
> >> kernel, cpu-hotplug feature now works on big-endian(BE-8) ARM
> >> platform.
> >> Since the ARM core can be configured by system software to work in
> >> big-endian mode, it's necessary to fix this problem. And here is a
> >> small patch :
> >>
> >> diff -urN linux-3.6.2/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> >> linux/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> >> --- linux-3.6.2/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c 2012-10-13
> >> 04:50:59.000000000 +0800
> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c 2012-10-15 23:05:44.000000000 +0800
> >> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
> >> /*
> >> * here's the WFI
> >> */
> >> - asm(".word 0xe320f003\n"
> >> + asm(".inst 0xe320f003\n"
> >
> > The cleanest fix would simply be to build these files with appropriate
> > modified CFLAGS (-march=armv6k or -march=armv7-a), and use the proper
> > "wfi" mnemonic.
> >
> > Failing that, you could use the facilities in <asm/opcodes.h> to
> > declare a wrapper macro for injecting this opcode (see
> > <asm/opcodes-virt.h> for an example). However, putting custom
> > opcodes into the assembler should only be done if it's really
> > necessary. Nowadays, I think we can consider tools which don't
> > understand the WFI mnemonic to be obsolete, at least for platforms
> > which only build for v7 and above.
> >
> > The relevant board maintainers would need to sign off on such a
> > change, so we don't end up breaking their builds.
> >
> > If any of these boards needs to build for v6K, the custom opcode might
> > be worth it -- some people might just possibly be relying on older tools
> > for such platforms.
> >
> > Cheers
> > ---Dave
> >
> >> :
> >> :
> >> : "memory", "cc");
> >> diff -urN linux-3.6.2/arch/arm/mach-realview/hotplug.c
> >> linux/arch/arm/mach-realview/hotplug.c
> >> --- linux-3.6.2/arch/arm/mach-realview/hotplug.c 2012-10-13
> >> 04:50:59.000000000 +0800
> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/mach-realview/hotplug.c 2012-10-15 23:05:00.000000000 +0800
> >> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
> >> /*
> >> * here's the WFI
> >> */
> >> - asm(".word 0xe320f003\n"
> >> + asm(".inst 0xe320f003\n"
> >> :
> >> :
> >> : "memory", "cc");
> >> diff -urN linux-3.6.2/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/hotplug.c
> >> linux/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/hotplug.c
> >> --- linux-3.6.2/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/hotplug.c 2012-10-13
> >> 04:50:59.000000000 +0800
> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/hotplug.c 2012-10-15 23:05:25.000000000 +0800
> >> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
> >> /*
> >> * here's the WFI
> >> */
> >> - asm(".word 0xe320f003\n"
> >> + asm(".inst 0xe320f003\n"
> >> :
> >> :
> >> : "memory", "cc");
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> >> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. The ".inst" directive here may also bring
> us trouble if some older tools is used.
> In that situation, "wfi" mnemonic will not be recognized either. If we
> cannot suppose that newer tools is used, then how can we determine the
> endianness during the preprocessor/compile phase? Any ideas?
The endianness is controlled by the build-time configuration of the
kernel. A single kernel image cannot be bi-endian.
The __inst_*() macros in <asm/opcodes.h> take care of this based on which
CONFIG_CPU_ENDIAN_* option is selected by the board in the kernel config.
For compatibility with old tools, this is done instead of using the
".inst" directive.
> BTW: I found this bug on my ARM V7-A Cortex-A9 board and the processor
> is configured to work in big-endian mode at boot stage (word and
> halfword data is interpreted as big-endian, but instruction is still
> little-endian) . The kernel is ported from arch/arm/mach-realview. And
> I think these boards(mach-realview/mach-shmobile/mach-exynos) should
> have the similar problems. ARM arch is Bi-endian since versions 3 and
> above.
I believe that shmobile and exynos are v7-only, so it may be better to
just use "wfi" and override the CFLAGS for those files. As you can
see, those were just created by copy-pasting the code from mach-realview.
realview itself can be used with ARMv6 based core-tiles, so there may be
an argument for a custom opcode in this case:
#include <asm/opcodes.h>
#define __WFI __inst_arm_thumb16(0xE320F003, 0xBF30)
Not handling the Thumb case is a definite bug for any file which may
run on v7, since the kernel could be built in Thumb for that case.
For example, the existing code is mach-realview/hotplug.c is broken
when building an SMP Thumb-2 kernel for the Realview PBX-A9.
Cheers
---Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists