linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] avr32: fix build error in atstk1006

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:04:44 -0700
From:	Håvard Skinnemoen <havard@...nnemoen.net>
To:	Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hskinnemoen@...il.com,
	egtvedt@...fundet.no, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	dedekind1@...il.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avr32: fix build error in atstk1006_defconfig

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> fixed the following compile error when use avr32 atstk1006_defconfig:
>   drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c: In function 'pmecc_err_location':
>   drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c:639: error: implicit declaration of function 'writel_relaxed'
>
> which was introduced by commit 1c7b874d33b463 ("mtd: at91: atmel_nand: add Programmable Multibit ECC controller support").
> The PMECC for nand flash code uses writel_relaxed(). But in avr32, there is no macro "writel_relaxed" defined. This patch add writex_relaxed macro definitions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>

Acked-by: Havard Skinnemoen <havard@...nnemoen.net>

I think it's OK to just forward to write[bwl] -- the relaxed variants
merely provide fewer ordering guarantees than the non-relaxed
variants. The worst that could happen is a small performance hit (and
on AVR32, even that is highly unlikely).

Havard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/