linux-kernel - Re: [Q] Default SLAB allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0000013a6aed8d12-71a82caf-366a-425c-a963-79077f62d673-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:54:44 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@...il.com>
cc:	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"celinux-dev@...ts.celinuxforum.org" 
	<celinux-dev@...ts.celinuxforum.org>
Subject: Re: [Q] Default SLAB allocator

On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:

> It might be worth reminding that very small systems can use SLOB
> allocator, which does not suffer from this kind of fragmentation.

Well, I have never seen non experimental systems that use SLOB. Others
have claimed they exist.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/