[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121016194044.GB27090@liondog.tnic>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:40:44 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Arjan Dan De Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Srivatssa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/12] x86, topology: Don't offline CPU0 if any PIC
irq can not be migrated out of it
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 06:43:36PM +0000, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c doesn't contain CPU hotplug hooks.
> To place the BSP patchset in this file, other existing CPU hotplug
> code should be moved to this file as well. Apparently that's not this
> patchset's task.
Right, ok.
But looking at this a bit more, we (someone :)) should probably merge
those two files together since both deal with the cpu aspect of
topology...
Oh well.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists