[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210171039410.7402@axis700.grange>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:43:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Q] reprobe deferred-probing drivers
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've got a situation, for which I currently don't have a (good) solution.
Ok, right, would it be acceptable to just do something like
if (dev->parent)
device_lock(dev->parent);
device_release_driver(dev);
device_attach(dev);
?
Thanks
Guennadi
> Let's say device A depends on device B and as long as B hasn't probed, A
> requests deferred probing. Now B probes, which causes A to also succeed
> its probing. Next we want to remove B, say, by unloading its driver. A has
> to go back into "deferred-probing" state. How do we do it? This can be
> achieved by unloading B's driver and loading again. Essentially, we have
> to use the sysfs "unbind" and then the "bind" attributes. But how do we do
> this from the kernel? Shall we export driver_bind() and driver_unbind()?
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists