linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: vexpress: Add missing n

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1350471723.1242.67.camel@hornet>
Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:02:03 +0100
From:	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: vexpress: Add missing n_voltages setting

On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 04:26 +0100, Axel Lin wrote:
> I don't have a chance to compile test this patch because I could not
> find VEXPRESS_CONFIG in current tree.
> Can you help testing this patch?

I'll be more than happy to help, but can you please tell me what use
case you have in mind? The "reg->desc.continuous_voltage_range = true;"
together with this patch:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git;a=commitdiff;h=bd7a2b600ace90c8819495b639a744c8f5c68feb

were supposed to make the n_voltages unnecessary, as this regulator is
(in theory at least) capable of setting any voltage in the constraints
range, so there are not real operating points.

Cheers!

Paweł


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/