linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/10] ext4: balloc: Fixed coding style issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1210171359270.30534@dhcp-1-104.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:05:25 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To:	Adil Mujeeb <mujeeb.adil@...il.com>
cc:	tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] ext4: balloc: Fixed coding style issue

On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Adil Mujeeb wrote:

> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:42:56 +0530
> From: Adil Mujeeb <mujeeb.adil@...il.com>
> To: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
>     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Adil Mujeeb <mujeeb.adil@...il.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 01/10] ext4: balloc: Fixed coding style issue
> 
> Fixed checkpatch.pl reported ERRORs

Hi Adil,

let me ask you something. How useful do you think those changes are ?
Have you learned anything by creating those patches ?

Just to clarify why I am asking such weird questions. It's not one of
those sneer questions, I would really like to know.

Thanks!
-Lukas

> 
> Signed-off-by: Adil Mujeeb <mujeeb.adil@...il.com>
> ---
>  linux-3.7-rc1/fs/ext4/balloc.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/linux-3.7-rc1/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/linux-3.7-rc1/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> index 1b50890..395418d 100644
> --- a/linux-3.7-rc1/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> +++ b/linux-3.7-rc1/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ unsigned ext4_free_clusters_after_init(struct super_block *sb,
>   * @bh:			pointer to the buffer head to store the block
>   *			group descriptor
>   */
> -struct ext4_group_desc * ext4_get_group_desc(struct super_block *sb,
> +struct ext4_group_desc *ext4_get_group_desc(struct super_block *sb,
>  					     ext4_group_t block_group,
>  					     struct buffer_head **bh)
>  {
> @@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static unsigned long ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa(struct super_block *sb,
>  	if (!ext4_bg_has_super(sb, group))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	if (EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb,EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG))
> +	if (EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG))
>  		return le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_first_meta_bg);
>  	else
>  		return EXT4_SB(sb)->s_gdb_count;
> @@ -721,11 +721,11 @@ unsigned long ext4_bg_num_gdb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group)
>  			le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_first_meta_bg);
>  	unsigned long metagroup = group / EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb);
>  
> -	if (!EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb,EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG) ||
> +	if (!EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG) ||
>  			metagroup < first_meta_bg)
>  		return ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa(sb, group);
>  
> -	return ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta(sb,group);
> +	return ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta(sb, group);
>  
>  }
>  
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/