[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1350482482.26103.495.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:01:22 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: restore correct batch limiting
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 21:18 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > /* did other CPU force QS recently? */
> > - long blimit; /* Upper limit on a processed batch */
> > + int blimit; /* Upper limit on a processed batch */
> >
> > /* 3) dynticks interface. */
> > + int dynticks_snap; /* Per-GP tracking for dynticks. */
> > struct rcu_dynticks *dynticks; /* Shared per-CPU dynticks state. */
> > - int dynticks_snap; /* Per-GP tracking for dynticks. */
>
> Hm, no words in change log for shuffling dynticks_snap...
I dont like adding two 32bit holes on a structure ;)
This kind of trivial things dont need a changelog, especially when
fixing a critical bug.
I let Paul add this if he really wants.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists