[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1350483095.3072.35.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:11:35 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86, MCA: Finish mca_config conversion
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 13:13 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> mce_ser, mce_bios_cmci_threshold and mce_disabled are the last three
> bools which need conversion. Move them to the mca_config struct and
> adjust usage sites accordingly.
[]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
[]
> @@ -1009,6 +1004,7 @@ static void mce_clear_info(struct mce_info *mi)
> */
> void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
> {
> + struct mca_config *cfg = &mca_cfg;
trivia:
Why use cfg?
This indirection and the cfg-> uses just seem obfuscating.
Isn't mca_cfg. used everywhere else?
No line wrapping is saved by indirecting.
> @@ -1036,7 +1032,7 @@ void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
>
> this_cpu_inc(mce_exception_count);
>
> - if (!mca_cfg.banks)
> + if (!cfg->banks)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists