[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVO-h15jrcGbHe6v=wgTr3X3gQnB1Am4x376Mac=vEj3_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:02:24 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Q] reprobe deferred-probing drivers
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
<g.liakhovetski@....de> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I've got a situation, for which I currently don't have a (good) solution.
>
> Ok, right, would it be acceptable to just do something like
>
> if (dev->parent)
> device_lock(dev->parent);
> device_release_driver(dev);
> device_attach(dev);
The above should be OK for your purpose, and looks some other
deferred-probe devices may need this handling too.
But I am wondering how you could get the pointer of device A for
releasing driver in device B's remove()?
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists