linux-kernel - Re: new execve/kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:19:53 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Cc:	Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
	Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
	Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: new execve/kernel_thread design

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:07:03PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> What happens during boot is this:
> 	* init_task (not to be confused with init) is used as current during
> infrastructure initializations.  Once everything needed for scheduler and
> for working fork is set, we spawn two threads - future init and future
> kthreadd.  The last thing we do with init_task is telling init that kthreadd
> has been spawned.  After that init_task turns itself into an idle thread.
> 	* future init waits for kthreadd to be spawned (it would be more
> natural to fork them in opposite order, but we want init to have PID 1 -
> too much stuff in userland depends on that).  Then it does the rest of
> initialization, including setting up initramfs contents.  And does
> kernel_execve() on /init.  Note that this is a task that had been created
> by kernel_thread() and is currently in function called from
> ret_from_kernel_thread().  Its kernel stack has been set up by copy_thread().
> That's where pt_regs need to be set up; note that they'll be passed to
> start_thread() before you return to userland.  If there are any magic bits
> in pt_regs needed by return-from-syscall code, set them in kthread case of
> copy_thread().

PS: I suspect that we end up with the wrong value in childregs->msr;
start_thread() only add MSR_UMS there.  I'd suggest running the kernel
with these patches + printk childregs->msr the very first time start_thread()
is called and see what it prints, then working kernel + such printk and
compare the results...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/