[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210171623040.20813@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, devel@...nvz.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/14] res_counter: return amount of charges after
res_counter_uncharge
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
> It is useful to know how many charges are still left after a call to
> res_counter_uncharge. While it is possible to issue a res_counter_read
> after uncharge, this can be racy.
>
> If we need, for instance, to take some action when the counters drop
> down to 0, only one of the callers should see it. This is the same
> semantics as the atomic variables in the kernel.
>
> Since the current return value is void, we don't need to worry about
> anything breaking due to this change: nobody relied on that, and only
> users appearing from now on will be checking this value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Acked-by: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> CC: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>
> CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists