[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <507E3EA6.5080809@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:14:14 +0900
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Kosina <jiri.kosina@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] mm: teach mm by current context info to not
do I/O during memory allocation
(2012/10/17 0:59), Ming Lei wrote:
> This patch introduces PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO on process flag('flags' field of
> 'struct task_struct'), so that the flag can be set by one task
> to avoid doing I/O inside memory allocation in the task's context.
>
> The patch trys to solve one deadlock problem caused by block device,
> and the problem may happen at least in the below situations:
>
> - during block device runtime resume, if memory allocation with
> GFP_KERNEL is called inside runtime resume callback of any one
> of its ancestors(or the block device itself), the deadlock may be
> triggered inside the memory allocation since it might not complete
> until the block device becomes active and the involed page I/O finishes.
> The situation is pointed out first by Alan Stern. It is not a good
> approach to convert all GFP_KERNEL in the path into GFP_NOIO because
> several subsystems may be involved(for example, PCI, USB and SCSI may
> be involved for usb mass stoarage device)
>
> - during error handling of usb mass storage deivce, USB bus reset
> will be put on the device, so there shouldn't have any
> memory allocation with GFP_KERNEL during USB bus reset, otherwise
> the deadlock similar with above may be triggered. Unfortunately, any
> usb device may include one mass storage interface in theory, so it
> requires all usb interface drivers to handle the situation. In fact,
> most usb drivers don't know how to handle bus reset on the device
> and don't provide .pre_set() and .post_reset() callback at all, so
> USB core has to unbind and bind driver for these devices. So it
> is still not practical to resort to GFP_NOIO for solving the problem.
>
> Also the introduced solution can be used by block subsystem or block
> drivers too, for example, set the PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO flag before doing
> actual I/O transfer.
>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jiri.kosina@...e.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
> Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 11 +++++++++++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 10 +++++++++-
> mm/vmscan.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index f6961c9..c149ae7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1811,6 +1811,7 @@ extern void thread_group_times(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut, cputime_t *
> #define PF_FROZEN 0x00010000 /* frozen for system suspend */
> #define PF_FSTRANS 0x00020000 /* inside a filesystem transaction */
> #define PF_KSWAPD 0x00040000 /* I am kswapd */
> +#define PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO 0x00080000 /* Allocating memory without IO involved */
> #define PF_LESS_THROTTLE 0x00100000 /* Throttle me less: I clean memory */
> #define PF_KTHREAD 0x00200000 /* I am a kernel thread */
> #define PF_RANDOMIZE 0x00400000 /* randomize virtual address space */
> @@ -1848,6 +1849,16 @@ extern void thread_group_times(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut, cputime_t *
> #define tsk_used_math(p) ((p)->flags & PF_USED_MATH)
> #define used_math() tsk_used_math(current)
>
> +#define memalloc_noio() (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO)
> +#define memalloc_noio_save(noio_flag) do { \
> + (noio_flag) = current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO; \
> + current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO; \
> +} while (0)
> +#define memalloc_noio_restore(noio_flag) do { \
> + if (!(noio_flag)) \
> + current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO; \
> +} while (0)
> +
> /*
> * task->jobctl flags
> */
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 8e1be1c..e3746dd 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2630,10 +2630,18 @@ retry_cpuset:
> page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask|__GFP_HARDWALL, nodemask, order,
> zonelist, high_zoneidx, alloc_flags,
> preferred_zone, migratetype);
> - if (unlikely(!page))
> + if (unlikely(!page)) {
> + /*
> + * Resume, block IO and its error handling path
> + * can deadlock because I/O on the device might not
> + * complete.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(memalloc_noio()))
> + gfp_mask &= ~GFP_IOFS;
> page = __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_mask, order,
> zonelist, high_zoneidx, nodemask,
> preferred_zone, migratetype);
> + }
>
> trace_mm_page_alloc(page, order, gfp_mask, migratetype);
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 1e9aa66..6647805 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -3298,6 +3298,19 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> };
> unsigned long nr_slab_pages0, nr_slab_pages1;
>
> + if (unlikely(memalloc_noio())) {
> + sc.gfp_mask &= ~GFP_IOFS;
> + shrink.gfp_mask = sc.gfp_mask;
> + /*
> + * We allow to reclaim only clean pages.
> + * It can affect RECLAIM_SWAP and RECLAIM_WRITE mode
> + * but this is really rare event and allocator can
> + * fallback to other zones.
> + */
> + sc.may_writepage = 0;
> + sc.may_swap = 0;
I think the idea is reasonable. I have a request.
In current implemententation of vmscan.c, it seems sc.may_writepage, sc.may_swap
are handled independent from gfp_mask.
So, could you drop changes from this patch and handle these flags in another patch
if these flags should be unset if ~GFP_IOFS ?
I think try_to_free_page() path's sc.may_xxxx should be handled in the same way.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists