linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: esdhc: enable polling to detect card by itself

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121018054053.GA4513@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:50:33 +0800
From:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To:	Yong Ding <yongd@...vell.com>
Cc:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
	Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Wilson Callan <wilson.callan@...antsystems.com>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Zhangfei Gao <zgao6@...vell.com>,
	Kevin Liu <kliu5@...vell.com>, Jialing Fu <jlfu@...vell.com>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: esdhc: enable polling to detect card by itself

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:01:40PM -0700, Yong Ding wrote:
> Shawn,
> Thanks for your comment. And sorry for my so late due to illness:-)
> SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION is used for notifying we don't use the host internal card detection method so that we don't need enable/disable those relevant interrupt bits of host(sdhci_set_card_detection in sdhci.c). 
> And as I double-checked the latest kernel code, actually sdhci-esdhc-imx sets this flag by default, and then will clear it only when the detection type is ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLER. So this aligns with my understanding. 

What I was saying is the bit will be cleared when the detection type is
ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLE or ESDHC_CD_GPIO.  You may have missed the fact that
there is no "break" in case ESDHC_CD_GPIO but a "fall through" comment.

        switch (boarddata->cd_type) {
        case ESDHC_CD_GPIO:
                err = gpio_request_one(boarddata->cd_gpio, GPIOF_IN, "ESDHC_CD");
                if (err) {
                        dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
                                "no card-detect pin available!\n");
                        goto no_card_detect_pin;
                }

                err = request_irq(gpio_to_irq(boarddata->cd_gpio), cd_irq,
                                 IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
                                 mmc_hostname(host->mmc), host);
                if (err) {
                        dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "request irq error\n");
                        goto no_card_detect_irq;
                }
                /* fall through */

        case ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLER:
                /* we have a working card_detect back */
                host->quirks &= ~SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION;
                break;

        case ESDHC_CD_PERMANENT:
                host->mmc->caps = MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE;
                break;

        case ESDHC_CD_NONE:
                break;
        }

Shawn

> What I want to do is that 1st we shall set MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL by our host driver itself and 2nd remove the improper logic in sdhci_add_host() . How do u think? Thanks.
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/