[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121018061451.GA21277@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:14:51 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, devel@...nvz.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/14] memcg: kmem accounting lifecycle management
On Wed 17-10-12 16:28:38, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
[...]
> > +
> > +static void memcg_kmem_mark_dead(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > +{
> > + if (test_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_accounted))
> > + set_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_DEAD, &memcg->kmem_accounted);
> > +}
>
> The set_bit() doesn't happen atomically with the test_bit(), what
> synchronization is required for this?
The group has to be active in order to become dead so the ordering is
natural and you do not need to test&set atomicaly. Also once a group
becomes active it is always marked that way until it goes away.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists