[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <507FBE1B.4080906@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:30:19 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] memcg: make mem_cgroup_reparent_charges non failing
> static int mem_cgroup_force_empty_write(struct cgroup *cont, unsigned int event)
> @@ -5013,13 +5011,9 @@ free_out:
> static int mem_cgroup_pre_destroy(struct cgroup *cont)
> {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
> - int ret;
>
> - css_get(&memcg->css);
> - ret = mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(memcg);
> - css_put(&memcg->css);
> -
> - return ret;
> + mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(memcg);
> + return 0;
> }
>
Why don't you make pre_destroy() return void?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists