[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121018005432.GA20163@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:54:32 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jwboyer@...hat.com, pjones@...hat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: sign the modules at install time
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 03:44:28PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:19 PM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > It's probably even better to just get rid of all the automatic module signing
> > stuff completely and leave the sign-file script for the builder to use
> > manually. The module verification code will still be present.
>
> That's just disgusting crazy talk.
>
> Christ, David, get a grip on yourself. You seem to dismiss the "people
> want to build their own kernel" people entirely.
>
> One of the main sane use-cases for module signing is:
>
> - CONFIG_CHECK_SIGNATURE=y
> - randomly generated one-time key
> - "make modules_install; make install"
> - "make clean" to get rid of the keys.
> - reboot.
I want that too, but right now 'make clean' leaves the keys around,
which seems a bit dangerous to me.
David, why aren't the keys cleaned up as well? Was that on purpose or
just an oversight?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists