[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121018101741.GA4503@mark-lap>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:17:52 +0100
From: Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jeffrey Ladouceur <jladouceur@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: et131x: Fix 64bit tx dma address handling
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:59:56AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > + skb_headlen(skb),
> > > + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > > + desc[frag].addr_lo = dma_addr & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> > > + desc[frag].addr_hi = dma_addr >> 32;
> >
> > Maybe use macros defined in kernel.h instead:
> >
> > desc[frag].addr_lo = lower_32_bits(dma_addr);
> > desc[frag].addr_hi = upper_32_bits(dma_addr);
> >
> > A few more instances below.
>
> This is actually important because >> 32 of a 32bit value is undefined in
> C. The compiler is free to do what it likes with this. While the results
> are usually sane some architectures do generate the equivalent of
>
> x >> (n % wordsize);
>
> Alan
Thanks for the comments both. I'll send an updated patch this evening.
The intention is to eventually store this value as a dma_addr_t anyway,
but some more work needs to be done to copy the address correctly to the
desc ring.
Cheers,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists